We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
What Are Seriatim Opinions and Their Role in Legal Judgments?
Definition & Meaning
A seriatim opinion is a legal term that refers to a situation where each judge on a bench writes their own separate opinion regarding a case. Unlike a single opinion that represents the consensus of the court, seriatim opinions allow each judge to express their individual views. This practice is often seen in appellate courts, where judges may have differing interpretations of the law or the facts of a case.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Seriatim opinions are primarily used in appellate courts, where judges review decisions made by lower courts. This practice allows for a more detailed exploration of legal issues, as each judge can present their reasoning. While the U.S. Supreme Court has largely moved away from this practice to promote a unified voice, it remains common in England and some other jurisdictions.
In the U.S., seriatim opinions may arise in various legal areas, including civil, criminal, and family law. Users can find templates for legal documents related to appellate procedures on platforms like US Legal Forms, which can assist in managing their cases effectively.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: In a hypothetical case regarding a civil rights violation, three judges on an appellate bench may each write their own opinions. Judge A might focus on constitutional implications, Judge B may emphasize statutory interpretation, and Judge C could highlight procedural issues.
Example 2: In a criminal appeal, one judge may agree with the outcome but disagree on the legal reasoning, leading to a seriatim opinion that outlines their unique perspective on the case.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Practice of Seriatim Opinions
California
Generally follows a unified opinion practice.
New York
May issue seriatim opinions in certain appellate cases.
Texas
Typically issues a single opinion but allows for concurring opinions.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Majority Opinion
A single opinion that reflects the views of the majority of judges on a case.
Dissenting Opinion
An opinion written by one or more judges expressing disagreement with the majority opinion.
Concurring Opinion
An opinion that agrees with the majority but offers different reasoning.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself involved in a case that may result in seriatim opinions, consider consulting with a legal professional for guidance. You can also explore US Legal Forms for templates that may help you navigate the appellate process effectively. If your situation is complex, seeking professional legal assistance is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.