An extrajudicial opinion is an opinion expressed by a judge or legal authority that falls outside the official scope of their judicial role. These opinions are not legally binding and are considered void. Extrajudicial opinions can also refer to personal or academic views shared by judges in contexts that do not involve formal court proceedings.
Extrajudicial opinions are often encountered in various legal contexts, including civil, criminal, and family law. They may arise during discussions, scholarly articles, or public speeches where judges express their thoughts on legal principles or issues without being part of a formal judicial process. While these opinions can provide insight into a judge's perspective, they do not carry legal authority and should not be relied upon as precedent.
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
For instance, a judge might give a lecture at a law school discussing their views on sentencing reform. This opinion, while insightful, is considered extrajudicial and does not influence actual court decisions. (hypothetical example)
| Term | Definition | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Judicial Opinion | An opinion issued by a court as part of a legal decision. | Judicial opinions are binding; extrajudicial opinions are not. |
| Advisory Opinion | An opinion issued by a court or authority on a legal question without binding effect. | Advisory opinions may still carry some authority; extrajudicial opinions do not. |
If you encounter an extrajudicial opinion, it's important to understand that it is not legally binding. For legal matters, rely on official court opinions or seek guidance from a legal professional. If you need assistance with legal documents, consider exploring US Legal Forms' templates designed by qualified attorneys.
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
An extrajudicial opinion is a judge's opinion expressed outside of formal court proceedings, which is not legally binding.