We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding Verbis Standum Ubi Nulla Ambiguitas in Legal Context
Definition & Meaning
The phrase "verbis standum ubi nulla ambiguitas" translates to "one must abide by the words where there is no ambiguity." This legal principle asserts that when the language in a legal document is clear and unambiguous, it should be followed as written. This rule is essential in interpreting deeds and contracts, ensuring that the intentions of the parties involved are honored. If the language is ambiguous, however, further interpretation is necessary to determine the true meaning and intent behind the words used.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This maxim is primarily used in contract law, property law, and statutory interpretation. It serves as a guiding principle for judges and attorneys when determining the meaning of legal documents. In cases where the wording is straightforward, courts typically enforce the document as it stands. However, if ambiguity arises, legal professionals may need to look at external factors, such as the context in which the document was created, to clarify the parties' intentions. Users can utilize legal templates from US Legal Forms to draft clear and effective documents that minimize ambiguity.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A property deed states that "the land is sold to John Smith." Since the language is clear, the court would enforce this as is, without further interpretation.
Example 2: A contract includes a clause that states, "the delivery will occur within a reasonable time." If there is a dispute over what constitutes "reasonable," the court may need to interpret this language based on the context of the agreement (hypothetical example).
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Interpretation Approach
California
Emphasizes the intent of the parties, often considering extrinsic evidence.
Texas
Favors the plain meaning of the words used in the document.
New York
Utilizes a strict interpretation, focusing on the text of the document.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Difference
Ambiguity
Uncertainty in meaning or interpretation of words.
Ambiguity requires interpretation; clear terms do not.
Construction
The process of interpreting the meaning of legal documents.
Construction is applied when ambiguity exists.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are dealing with a legal document that may involve this principle, ensure that the language is clear and unambiguous. If you encounter ambiguity, consider consulting a legal professional for guidance. Additionally, you can explore US Legal Forms for templates that help create clear legal documents, minimizing the risk of ambiguity.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.