We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding Verdict Contrary to Law: Legal Insights and Implications
Definition & Meaning
A verdict contrary to law is a jury's decision that is not supported by the evidence presented during the trial. This type of verdict is not authorized by law, meaning that the conclusion reached by the jury does not align with legal standards or the facts of the case. Judges have the authority to intervene in such verdicts to prevent unjust outcomes. They can overrule the jury's decision, amend it, or even reverse it if they determine that the jury's conclusion lacks sufficient factual support or misapplies the law.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This term is commonly used in various areas of law, including civil and criminal cases. In legal practice, a verdict contrary to law may arise when a jury's decision is challenged due to perceived errors in judgment or application of the law. Judges may utilize their discretionary power to ensure that jury verdicts reflect a fair interpretation of the evidence and legal principles. Users can manage related legal processes with the help of templates provided by US Legal Forms, which are drafted by experienced attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: In a criminal trial, a jury finds a defendant guilty based on witness testimony that is later proven to be unreliable. The judge may overturn the verdict, citing insufficient evidence to support the jury's conclusion.
Example 2: A jury awards damages in a civil case that exceed the legal limits established by statute. The judge may amend the verdict to align with the statutory cap on damages. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Legal Standard
California
Judges can overturn a verdict if it is not supported by substantial evidence.
New York
A judge may grant a motion to set aside a verdict if it is contrary to the weight of the evidence.
Texas
Judges have the authority to grant a judgment notwithstanding the verdict if the jury's decision is unsupported by the evidence.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Verdict
The formal decision made by a jury.
A verdict contrary to law specifically refers to a decision that is not legally justified.
Judgment
The final decision by a court regarding the rights and obligations of the parties.
A judgment may uphold a jury's verdict, while a verdict contrary to law indicates a need for judicial intervention.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe a jury's verdict in your case is contrary to law, consider the following steps:
Consult with a legal professional who can evaluate the specifics of your case.
Gather evidence that supports your claim that the verdict is unjustified.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that may assist you in filing motions or appeals related to the verdict.
Be prepared for the possibility of a legal appeal, which may require additional legal expertise.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.