We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding Verba Fortius Accipiuntur Contra Proferentem in Contract Law
Definition & Meaning
The phrase verba fortius accipiuntur contra proferentem is a Latin legal maxim that translates to "words must be construed against those who use them." This principle is applied in contract law, indicating that when a contract contains ambiguous language, it should be interpreted in a way that is unfavorable to the party that drafted it. This ensures fairness, particularly when one party may have more power or knowledge in creating the contract.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This maxim is predominantly used in contract law. It serves as a guiding principle during disputes over contract interpretation, particularly when the wording is unclear or open to multiple interpretations. Legal professionals often invoke this principle to protect the interests of the non-drafting party, ensuring that they are not unfairly disadvantaged by ambiguous terms.
It is relevant in various legal areas, including:
Civil law
Commercial transactions
Real estate agreements
Users can manage some aspects of contract drafting and interpretation using legal templates from US Legal Forms, which are designed by experienced attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: In a lease agreement, if the terms regarding maintenance responsibilities are vague, a court may interpret those terms against the landlord, who drafted the lease.
Example 2: A service contract that contains unclear clauses about payment terms may lead a court to favor the service provider if the customer is the one who wrote the ambiguous terms. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Interpretation Approach
California
Favors the non-drafting party in ambiguous contracts.
New York
Similar approach, emphasizing the intent of the parties.
Texas
May allow for more leeway in interpreting the drafter's intent.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Description
Difference
Contra proferentem
Similar principle of interpreting ambiguous terms against the drafter.
Verba fortius emphasizes stronger wording; contra proferentem focuses on ambiguity.
Ambiguity
Unclear language that can be interpreted in multiple ways.
Ambiguity is a condition that triggers the application of verba fortius.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation involving ambiguous contract language, consider the following steps:
Review the contract carefully to identify any unclear terms.
Consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and options.
Utilize legal templates from US Legal Forms to draft or revise contracts clearly.
In complex situations, seeking professional legal help is advisable to ensure your interests are protected.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.