We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Quando Quod Ago Non Valet Ut Ago, Valeat Quantum Valere Potest
Understanding Quando Quod Ago Non Valet Ut Ago, Valeat Quantum Valere Potest in Legal Context
Definition & Meaning
The phrase "quando quod ago non valet ut agam, valeat quantum valere potest" translates to "when that which I do is not valid as I do it, let it have as much validity as it can have." This legal maxim suggests that if a legal action cannot be executed as intended, courts will attempt to interpret it in a way that allows it to be effective in some capacity. Essentially, it emphasizes the importance of achieving the intended purpose of a legal document or action, even if the original form is flawed.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This maxim is often invoked in civil law, particularly in contract and property law. It is relevant when a legal document, such as a deed or contract, fails to meet the necessary legal requirements to be enforceable. In such cases, judges may look for alternative interpretations to uphold the document's intent. Users can manage related legal matters using templates from US Legal Forms, which provide guidance on drafting valid legal documents.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
For instance, if a property deed is improperly executed and cannot transfer ownership as intended, the court may interpret it as a valid agreement to establish a lease instead. This ensures that the parties involved still achieve some legal benefit from their agreement.
(Hypothetical example) If two parties intended to create a partnership but failed to file the necessary paperwork, a court may recognize the partnership based on their actions and agreements, allowing them to operate as a business.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Legal Interpretation
California
Courts may interpret flawed contracts liberally to uphold the parties' intent.
New York
Similar principles apply, but courts may require stricter adherence to formalities in certain cases.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Estoppel
A legal principle preventing someone from arguing something contrary to a claim they previously made.
Estoppel focuses on preventing contradictory claims, while the maxim addresses the validity of actions.
Waiver
The voluntary relinquishment of a known right.
Waiver involves giving up a right, whereas the maxim seeks to salvage the intent of a flawed action.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation where a legal action or document is not valid as intended, consider the following steps:
Review the document to understand its intent and the reasons for its invalidity.
Consult with a legal professional to explore options for reinterpreting or correcting the document.
Consider using templates from US Legal Forms to create a new document that accurately reflects your intentions.
For complex matters, seeking professional legal assistance is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.