We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Quando Res Non Valet Ut Ago, Valeat Quantum Valere Potest
Understanding Quando Res Non Valet Ut Ago, Valeat Quantum Valere Potest in Law
Definition & Meaning
The phrase "Quando res non valet ut ago, valeat quantum valere potest" translates to "When the thing is not valid as I do it, let it have as much validity as it can have." This legal principle suggests that when a party intends to take action, and there are no legal restrictions preventing them, the legal documents or instruments they use should be interpreted in a way that fulfills their intentions as much as possible. This concept is often applied in contract law and other legal contexts where the validity of an action or document is in question.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This term is primarily used in legal contexts involving contract law and property rights. It emphasizes the importance of intention in legal documents and actions. Legal practitioners often reference this principle when dealing with situations where a party's intended action may not strictly adhere to formal legal requirements but still aims to achieve a valid outcome. Users can manage related forms or procedures using templates available through platforms like US Legal Forms.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A business owner submits a contract that lacks a required signature due to an oversight. The court may still enforce the contract if it is clear that both parties intended to agree to the terms.
Example 2: A property owner attempts to sell land without following specific zoning laws. If the sale is completed, the principle may allow the transaction to stand if the buyer acted in good faith and the seller intended to sell the property. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Application of the Principle
California
Strong emphasis on intention in contract disputes.
New York
Courts may enforce contracts with minor defects if intent is clear.
Texas
Focus on written agreements; however, intent can override technicalities.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Contract Validity
The legal enforceability of a contract.
Focuses on formal requirements rather than intention.
Good Faith
The intention to deal fairly in a transaction.
Emphasizes honesty and fairness rather than strict adherence to legal norms.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation where this principle may apply, consider the following steps:
Review the relevant documents to understand the intentions of all parties involved.
Consult with a legal professional to assess the validity of your actions and documents.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you draft or modify legal documents appropriately.
For complex matters, seeking professional legal help is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
It means "when the thing is not valid as I do it, let it have as much validity as it can have," emphasizing the importance of intention in legal matters.
Possibly, if the intention of both parties is clear and there are no significant legal barriers.
Consult with a legal professional and consider using templates from US Legal Forms to help draft your documents properly.