We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding Argumentum Ab Impossibilii Plurimum Valet In Lege: A Legal Perspective
Definition & Meaning
The phrase "argumentum ab impossibilii plurimum valet in lege" translates to "an argument drawn from inconvenience has much force in law." This legal principle suggests that when interpreting laws or contracts, the implications of adopting a particular interpretation can significantly influence the outcome. If a contract or statute contains ambiguous language, and one interpretation leads to considerable inconvenience, it may indicate that this interpretation does not align with the original intent of the parties involved. However, if only one clear interpretation exists, that interpretation will be upheld, even if it results in inconvenience, as it reflects the clear intention of the parties or legislature.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This principle is commonly applied in various areas of law, including contract law and statutory interpretation. It is particularly relevant in cases where the language used is ambiguous, leading to multiple potential interpretations. Legal professionals often rely on this principle to argue for a construction that minimizes inconvenience and aligns with the original intent of the parties or lawmakers. Users can manage related legal documents using templates from US Legal Forms, which are drafted by qualified attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: In a contract for the sale of goods, if the terms are vague and one interpretation leads to significant financial loss for one party, a court may consider this inconvenience when determining the appropriate construction of the contract.
Example 2: A statute that regulates business practices may have ambiguous wording. If one interpretation leads to unfair business practices, courts may reject that interpretation in favor of one that aligns with fair practices, even if it causes some inconvenience to businesses. (hypothetical example)
Comparison with related terms
Term
Description
Argumentum ad absurdum
A form of argument that demonstrates a statement is false by showing that a false, absurd, or contradictory result follows from its acceptance.
Argumentum ad consequentiam
An argument that concludes a proposition is true or false based on the consequences it would produce.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself dealing with a contract or statute that contains ambiguous language, consider seeking legal advice to understand the best course of action. You can also explore US Legal Forms for ready-to-use legal templates that can help you draft or respond to legal documents effectively. If the situation is complex, consulting a legal professional is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.