Nemo tenetur ad impossibile is a Latin legal principle that translates to "no one is bound to perform impossibility." This maxim asserts that individuals cannot be legally obligated to fulfill a contract or obligation when it is impossible to do so. The principle is rooted in the idea that enforcing such an obligation would be unjust, as it would require someone to achieve the unattainable.
This maxim is commonly referenced in various areas of law, including contract law and civil law. It is particularly relevant when discussing obligations that have become impossible to fulfill due to unforeseen circumstances. Legal practitioners often use this principle to argue that a party should not be held liable for failing to meet contractual obligations when those obligations cannot be met due to factors beyond their control.
For individuals dealing with contracts, understanding this principle can be crucial, especially when circumstances change unexpectedly. Users can manage related legal documents using templates from US Legal Forms, which provide guidance on how to navigate such situations.
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A contractor is hired to build a structure, but a natural disaster destroys the site before construction begins. The contractor cannot be held liable for failing to complete the project due to this unforeseen event. (hypothetical example)
Example 2: A person agrees to sell shares of bank stock, but due to a regulatory change, the bank is no longer in operation, making the transfer impossible. The seller cannot be held accountable for not completing the sale. (hypothetical example)
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
| State | Application of Nemo Tenetur Ad Impossibile |
|---|---|
| California | Recognizes the principle in contract disputes, especially in cases of natural disasters. |
| New York | Applies the maxim in commercial contracts, often requiring proof of impossibility. |
| Texas | Similar application, but emphasizes the need for clear evidence of impossibility. |
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
| Term | Definition | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Force Majeure | Events that prevent contract fulfillment due to extraordinary circumstances. | Force majeure typically includes specific events listed in contracts, while nemo tenetur ad impossibile applies more broadly to any impossibility. |
| Frustration of Purpose | A legal doctrine that voids a contract when its purpose is thwarted. | Frustration of purpose focuses on the intent behind the contract, while nemo tenetur ad impossibile focuses on the impossibility of performance. |
If you find yourself unable to fulfill a contractual obligation due to impossibility, consider the following steps:
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
It means that no one is bound to perform an impossible task or obligation.