We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding Argumentum Ab Auctoritate Fortissimum Est In Lege in Legal Context
Definition & Meaning
The phrase "argumentum ab auctoritate fortissimum est in lege" translates to "an argument from authority is the strongest in law." This principle suggests that legal arguments supported by authoritative sources, such as statutes, case law, or expert testimony, carry significant weight in legal proceedings. When individuals lack expertise in a particular area, they often rely on the insights of recognized authorities to substantiate their claims. This reliance helps courts determine the credibility and truthfulness of arguments presented during legal cases.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This principle is commonly applied in various areas of law, including civil, criminal, and family law. Courts often consider authoritative sources when evaluating the validity of arguments. For instance, in civil cases, a lawyer may cite expert testimony to support a claim regarding medical malpractice. Similarly, in criminal cases, attorneys might reference legal precedents to argue for or against a defendant's actions.
Users can manage certain legal procedures themselves by utilizing legal templates available through US Legal Forms, which are drafted by experienced attorneys and tailored to specific legal needs.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: In a personal injury lawsuit, a plaintiff may present a medical expert's testimony to establish the extent of their injuries. The court may give significant weight to this expert's opinion due to their qualifications and experience in the medical field.
Example 2: (hypothetical example) In a family law case involving custody, a psychologist's evaluation of the child's best interests may be considered authoritative evidence, influencing the court's decision on custody arrangements.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Legal Context
California
Strong reliance on expert testimony in personal injury cases.
New York
Judicial notice of certain authorities in family law matters.
Texas
Emphasis on statutory authority in contract disputes.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Argumentum ad verecundiam
Appeal to authority without sufficient evidence.
Less weight than argumentum ab auctoritate, as it may lack credibility.
Expert testimony
Evidence provided by a qualified individual.
Specific application of authority in legal arguments.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself needing to rely on authoritative arguments in a legal matter, consider the following steps:
Gather credible sources, such as expert opinions or relevant statutes.
Utilize US Legal Forms to access legal templates that can help you structure your arguments effectively.
If your situation is complex, consult a legal professional for tailored advice.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.