We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Contra Non Valentum Apre Nulla Currit Praescriptio
Understanding Contra Non Valentum Apre Nulla Currit Praescriptio: Legal Insights
Definition & Meaning
The phrase "contra non valentum apre nulla currit praescriptio" is a Latin legal maxim that translates to "no prescription runs against a person under disability." This principle means that if an individual is unable to assert their legal rights due to a disability, the time limit for bringing a legal claim does not apply to them. This maxim is important in ensuring that individuals who cannot act on their own behalf due to incapacitation or other disabilities are still afforded legal protections.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This term is primarily used in civil law contexts, where it relates to statutes of limitations and the ability of individuals to bring claims. It is relevant in cases involving personal injury, contract disputes, and property claims, among others. For instance, if a person is mentally incapacitated, the time limit for filing a lawsuit may be paused until they regain the ability to act. Users can manage related legal processes using templates from US Legal Forms, which are designed by experienced attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A person suffers a severe mental illness that prevents them from understanding their legal rights. Due to this condition, they are unable to file a lawsuit for a car accident that occurred while they were incapacitated. Under the principle of contra non valentum, the time limit for filing their claim is paused until they recover.
Example 2: A minor is injured in an accident. The statute of limitations for filing a claim does not begin until the minor reaches the age of majority, allowing them to pursue legal action once they are legally able to do so. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
State
Notes
California
California law allows for tolling of the statute of limitations for minors and individuals with disabilities.
New York
New York provides specific provisions for tolling in cases of mental incapacity.
Texas
Texas law also recognizes the tolling of limitations for individuals deemed legally incompetent.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Statute of limitations
A law that sets the maximum time after an event within which legal proceedings may be initiated.
Contra non valentum allows for exceptions to the statute of limitations based on disability.
Tolling
The legal suspension of the running of the statute of limitations.
Contra non valentum specifically addresses disabilities affecting a person's ability to file claims.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe you or someone you know may be affected by this legal principle, consider the following steps:
Assess the nature of the disability and its impact on the ability to file a claim.
Consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and options.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you manage the legal process effectively.
In complex situations, seeking professional legal assistance is advisable to ensure your rights are protected.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.