We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
What is Lochnerization? A Deep Dive into Its Legal Significance
Definition & Meaning
Lochnerization refers to a judicial approach where courts invalidate economic legislation by interpreting the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This term originates from the landmark case Lochner v. New York, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1905. In essence, Lochnerization involves a court exercising its judgment to overturn laws that it deems detrimental to economic freedom, often prioritizing individual rights over legislative intent.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Lochnerization is primarily used in constitutional law, particularly in cases involving economic regulation. It often arises in contexts where courts assess the balance between individual rights and government regulation. Users may encounter this term when dealing with issues related to labor laws, business regulations, or economic policies. For those looking to navigate these legal landscapes, US Legal Forms offers templates and resources that can help in drafting or understanding relevant legal documents.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
One example of Lochnerization is the Supreme Court's ruling in Lochner v. New York, where the Court struck down a state law regulating bakery working hours, arguing it interfered with the freedom of contract. Another hypothetical example could involve a court overturning a minimum wage law on the grounds that it infringes on an employer's right to set wages freely.
Relevant laws & statutes
The primary legal reference for Lochnerization is the Fourteenth Amendment, specifically the Due Process Clause. The case of Lochner v. New York (1905) is the most significant precedent, illustrating the application of this judicial approach.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Difference
Substantive due process
Legal doctrine protecting certain fundamental rights from government interference.
Lochnerization focuses specifically on economic rights, while substantive due process encompasses broader personal liberties.
Judicial activism
Judicial rulings that are suspected of being based on personal or political considerations rather than existing law.
Lochnerization is a specific form of judicial activism related to economic legislation.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself dealing with legislation that may be subject to Lochnerization, consider consulting legal resources or professionals who can provide guidance. US Legal Forms offers a variety of templates that can assist you in understanding or drafting necessary documents. If your situation is complex, seeking professional legal assistance is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.