We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Frustration of Purpose: Key Insights into Its Legal Implications
Definition & Meaning
Frustration of purpose is a legal concept in contract law that occurs when a significant change in circumstances undermines the primary reason for entering into a contract. This situation renders one party's performance of the contract meaningless to the other party. Unlike minor disappointments or loss of expected profits, frustration of purpose involves a substantial defeat of the contract's main objective. To seek relief under this doctrine, the affected party must demonstrate that they did not contribute to the circumstances causing the frustration and that the frustrating event was not reasonably foreseeable.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This term is primarily used in contract law, which is a branch of civil law. It applies when unforeseen events drastically alter the context in which a contract was made, making its fulfillment pointless. Users may encounter this concept in various legal situations, such as real estate transactions, service agreements, or commercial contracts. With the right tools, like US Legal Forms templates, individuals can manage their legal needs related to frustration of purpose effectively.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A couple signs a contract to rent a venue for their wedding. A natural disaster destroys the venue, making it impossible to hold the event. This situation may qualify as frustration of purpose because the main reason for the rental contract is defeated.
Example 2: A company contracts to purchase a specific type of equipment for a project. If a new law prohibits the use of that equipment, the purpose of the contract is frustrated, as the company can no longer utilize the equipment as intended. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
State
Key Differences
California
California courts may require a higher burden of proof for frustration of purpose claims.
New York
New York recognizes frustration of purpose but may apply different standards based on the type of contract.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Impossibility
Refers to situations where performance of the contract is literally impossible.
Frustration of purpose deals with the purpose being defeated, while impossibility addresses the inability to perform.
Commercial Impracticability
Applies when performance is possible but extremely burdensome or costly.
Frustration of purpose focuses on the loss of the contract's main objective, not just the difficulty of performance.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe your contract has been frustrated, consider the following steps:
Document the changes in circumstances that have affected the contract.
Gather evidence showing that the change defeats the contract's main purpose.
Consult a legal professional to discuss your options and determine if you can seek relief.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you draft necessary documents or agreements.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Key Requirement: Significant change in circumstances
Burden of Proof: On the party seeking relief
Common Contexts: Real estate, service contracts, commercial agreements
Key takeaways
Frequently asked questions
It is a legal doctrine that applies when a significant change in circumstances defeats the primary purpose of a contract.
Yes, as long as you did not contribute to the circumstances and the change was not a foreseeable risk.
You need to provide evidence that shows the change in circumstances has fundamentally defeated the contract's main goal.
No, frustration of purpose involves changes that make performance pointless, while breach of contract refers to failing to fulfill contractual obligations.
Document the changes, gather evidence, and consult a legal professional for advice.