We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Frye Motion: A Comprehensive Guide to Its Legal Definition and Application
Definition & Meaning
The Frye motion refers to a legal request made during a trial to exclude certain scientific evidence from being presented to the jury. This motion is based on the Frye standard, established in the case of Frye v. United States (1923), which requires that scientific evidence must be generally accepted within the relevant scientific community before it can be admitted in court. The aim of the Frye motion is to ensure that only reliable and widely recognized scientific methods are considered in legal proceedings.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The Frye motion is commonly used in various legal contexts, particularly in criminal and civil cases where scientific evidence is introduced. This includes cases involving forensic science, medical expert testimony, and other specialized fields. Individuals may use legal forms to file a Frye motion, ensuring that the evidence presented meets the necessary standards of acceptance. Users can find templates for these motions through services like US Legal Forms, which provide resources drafted by legal professionals.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: In a criminal case involving a defendant accused of murder, the prosecution wants to introduce DNA evidence obtained through a new testing method. The defense may file a Frye motion to challenge the admissibility of this evidence, arguing that the method has not gained general acceptance among forensic scientists.
Example 2: A civil lawsuit regarding a defective product may involve expert testimony about the safety of a new material. The defendant could file a Frye motion to exclude this testimony if it is based on an unproven scientific theory (hypothetical example).
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Frye Standard Application
California
Follows the Frye standard for scientific evidence.
New York
Also adheres to the Frye standard, requiring general acceptance.
Texas
Uses a modified version of the Frye standard.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Difference
Daubert Standard
A legal standard for admissibility of expert witness testimony.
Focuses on the judge's gatekeeping role regarding the reliability and relevance of evidence.
Motion in Limine
A pretrial motion to exclude certain evidence from being presented.
More general, while Frye specifically addresses scientific evidence.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation where a Frye motion may apply, consider the following steps:
Research the scientific evidence being presented and its acceptance in the relevant community.
Consult with a legal professional to understand the implications of filing a Frye motion.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you draft your motion effectively.
In complex cases, seeking professional legal assistance is advisable to ensure your rights are protected.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.