We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Frye Test: The Legal Benchmark for Scientific Evidence in Court
Definition & Meaning
The Frye test is a legal standard used to determine whether scientific evidence can be admitted in court. Originating from the 1923 case U.S. v. Frye, this test assesses whether the scientific methods or principles behind the evidence have gained general acceptance within the relevant scientific community. If the evidence does not meet this standard, it may be deemed inadmissible in court proceedings.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The Frye test is primarily used in criminal law to evaluate the admissibility of scientific evidence. Courts apply this standard to ensure that only reliable and widely accepted scientific methods are presented to juries. This is particularly relevant in cases involving forensic evidence, such as lie detector tests, DNA analysis, and other scientific techniques. Users may find templates and resources on US Legal Forms that can assist in navigating these legal processes.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: In a criminal trial, a defendant attempts to introduce results from a polygraph test to prove their innocence. The court evaluates the scientific basis of the polygraph and finds it does not meet the Frye standard, leading to the exclusion of the evidence.
Example 2: A prosecutor wants to use DNA evidence obtained from a crime scene. The court assesses whether the methods used to collect and analyze the DNA are generally accepted in the forensic community, ultimately allowing the evidence based on the Frye test. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
State
Frye Test Application
California
Adopts the Frye standard, but also uses the Daubert standard in some cases.
New York
Primarily follows the Frye standard for scientific evidence.
Texas
Uses the Daubert standard instead of Frye.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Difference
Daubert Standard
A rule used to determine the admissibility of expert witnesses' testimony.
Focuses on the reliability and relevance of scientific evidence rather than general acceptance.
General Acceptance
The principle that scientific evidence must be widely accepted in its field.
General acceptance is a component of the Frye test, but not the only criterion in other standards.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are involved in a case where scientific evidence is being presented, it's essential to understand whether the Frye test applies. Consider consulting with a legal professional to evaluate the admissibility of such evidence. Additionally, you can explore US Legal Forms for templates that may assist you in preparing your case.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Criteria: General acceptance, reliability, relevance
Key takeaways
Frequently asked questions
The Frye test is a legal standard used to determine if scientific evidence is admissible in court based on its general acceptance in the scientific community.
The Frye test focuses on general acceptance, while the Daubert standard emphasizes the reliability and relevance of the evidence presented.
The Frye test is primarily used in criminal law cases involving scientific evidence.