We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Drago Doctrine: A Key Principle in International Law
Definition & Meaning
The Drago Doctrine is a principle established by Luis Mara Drago, Argentina's Minister of Foreign Affairs, on December 29, 1902. This doctrine asserts that international law does not permit European nations to use military force to compel American countries to settle public debts. While the doctrine is rooted in earlier legal concepts, such as the Calvo Doctrine, it specifically focuses on the prohibition of armed intervention for debt collection. A modified version of the Drago Doctrine was later endorsed at the Hague Conference in 1907.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The Drago Doctrine is primarily relevant in international law and diplomatic relations. It applies to situations involving debt disputes between nations, particularly where one country seeks to enforce payment through military means. Legal practitioners may encounter this doctrine in cases involving sovereign debt, international treaties, and negotiations between governments. Users can manage related documentation using legal templates available from US Legal Forms.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
One example of the Drago Doctrine in action occurred when European powers attempted to intervene militarily in Latin American countries to enforce debt repayment. The doctrine served as a legal basis for these nations to resist such interventions, asserting their right to self-determination and protection from foreign military action.
(Hypothetical example): Imagine a scenario where a European country threatens military action against an American republic over unpaid debts. Under the Drago Doctrine, the threatened nation could argue that such action is unlawful under international law.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Calvo Doctrine
A principle stating that foreign investors should not receive special treatment from their home countries.
Focuses on investor rights rather than state sovereignty and military intervention.
Interventionism
The policy of intervening in another country's affairs, often militarily.
Drago Doctrine specifically limits intervention for debt collection, while interventionism can apply to various reasons.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation involving international debt disputes, it's essential to understand your rights under the Drago Doctrine. Consider seeking legal advice to navigate the complexities of international law. You can also explore ready-to-use legal form templates from US Legal Forms to assist with documentation related to your case.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.