We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
The Perlman Doctrine: A Key Legal Principle for Immediate Appeals
Definition & Meaning
The Perlman Doctrine is a legal principle that allows a third party to appeal a discovery order immediately. This applies when the order compels the third party to provide access to evidence or documents, and they may face contempt charges if they refuse to comply. The doctrine was established in the case Perlman v. United States, 247 U.S. 7 (1918), where the court determined that individuals affected by such orders are not without recourse. Instead of waiting for the order to become final, they can seek appellate review to challenge the order's validity.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The Perlman Doctrine is primarily used in the context of civil and criminal litigation, particularly regarding discovery processes. It is relevant in situations where third parties are ordered to provide access to documents or evidence that may be used against someone in a legal proceeding. Understanding this doctrine is essential for individuals and entities that might be compelled to produce evidence, as it outlines their rights to contest such orders promptly.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A company receives a court order to provide access to emails related to a criminal investigation. The company believes the order is unjust and fears repercussions for non-compliance. Under the Perlman Doctrine, the company can appeal the order immediately rather than waiting for the case to conclude.
Example 2: A doctor is ordered to submit patient records in a legal case. Concerned about patient confidentiality, the doctor can invoke the Perlman Doctrine to challenge the order before complying. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Differences
California
Encourages immediate appeals in certain civil cases.
New York
Allows for limited appeals on discovery orders but may require additional steps.
Texas
Has specific rules regarding the timing and grounds for appealing discovery orders.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Interlocutory appeal
An appeal of a ruling before the final judgment in a case.
Perlman Doctrine specifically applies to third-party discovery orders.
Contempt of court
Failure to comply with a court order.
The Perlman Doctrine provides a way to appeal before facing contempt.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you receive a discovery order that you believe is unjust, consider appealing the order under the Perlman Doctrine. It may be beneficial to consult with a legal professional to understand your options fully. Additionally, users can explore US Legal Forms' ready-to-use legal form templates to assist in managing the appeal process effectively.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.