We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
The Parker Doctrine: A Deep Dive into State Antitrust Immunity
Definition & Meaning
The Parker Doctrine, established in the case of Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943), asserts that states are exempt from federal antitrust laws when acting in their capacity as sovereign entities. This principle emerged from a dispute involving a California regulation that controlled the pricing and supply of raisins. The Supreme Court ruled that the Sherman Act, which governs antitrust laws, does not intend to restrict actions taken by states. Therefore, state regulations in this context are not subject to federal antitrust scrutiny, although similar actions by private individuals would violate the law.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The Parker Doctrine is primarily relevant in antitrust law, particularly when evaluating the legality of state actions that may affect market competition. It is significant in contexts where state regulations or actions could potentially conflict with federal antitrust provisions. Legal practitioners may encounter this doctrine when dealing with cases involving state regulations in various industries, such as agriculture, utilities, and transportation. Users can find legal forms related to antitrust issues and state regulations through US Legal Forms, which offers templates drafted by qualified attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A state government enacts a law that limits the number of new grocery stores in a specific area to protect local businesses. Under the Parker Doctrine, this regulation may be immune from federal antitrust challenges.
Example 2: A state agency sets price controls on electricity to stabilize costs for consumers. This action, taken by the state, would not be subject to federal antitrust scrutiny, as it is a sovereign act. (hypothetical example)
Relevant laws & statutes
The primary legal reference for the Parker Doctrine is the Sherman Antitrust Act, which outlines federal antitrust laws. The case of Parker v. Brown is a landmark decision that established the doctrine's principles.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Parker Doctrine
Exemption of state actions from federal antitrust laws.
Applies specifically to state actions as sovereigns.
State Action Immunity
Legal doctrine providing immunity to states under certain conditions.
Broader than the Parker Doctrine, may include other legal contexts.
Sherman Act
Federal law prohibiting monopolistic practices.
Applies to private entities, not state actions under the Parker Doctrine.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are involved in a situation where state actions may conflict with federal antitrust laws, consider the following steps:
Review the specific state regulation or action in question.
Consult with a legal professional to understand how the Parker Doctrine may apply to your case.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that may assist in addressing your legal needs.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.