We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Volens: A Comprehensive Guide to Its Legal Definition and Context
Definition & Meaning
Volens refers to a state of mind where an individual voluntarily accepts a specific risk. In legal contexts, this term is often used as a defense in cases where a person has willingly placed themselves in a situation that could lead to harm. The principle of volenti non fit injuria, which translates to "to a willing person, no injury is done," supports this concept. Essentially, if someone consents to take a risk and is fully aware of the potential dangers, they cannot pursue legal claims for any resulting harm.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Volens is primarily used in civil law, particularly in personal injury cases. It serves as a defense strategy when a defendant argues that the plaintiff accepted the risks associated with their actions or circumstances. Common scenarios include:
Sports injuries, where participants understand the risks involved.
Medical procedures, where patients consent to treatment after being informed of potential side effects.
Users can manage related legal matters using templates from US Legal Forms, which provide essential documents for various legal situations.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A person who voluntarily participates in a contact sport, such as football, understands the inherent risks of injury. If they are injured during play, they cannot sue the league for damages due to their acceptance of these risks.
Example 2: A patient undergoing surgery signs a consent form acknowledging the risks involved. If complications arise, they cannot claim damages for trespass since they consented to the procedure (hypothetical example).
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Key Differences
California
Generally follows the volenti non fit injuria doctrine, but also considers comparative negligence.
Texas
Allows for a defense based on assumption of risk, but the burden of proof lies with the defendant.
New York
Recognizes the doctrine but may limit its application in certain circumstances, such as in medical malpractice cases.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Assumption of Risk
A legal defense that claims a plaintiff accepted the risks associated with an activity.
Assumption of risk can be express or implied, while volens specifically emphasizes voluntary acceptance.
Negligence
Failure to take proper care in doing something, leading to damage or injury.
Negligence involves a breach of duty, whereas volens focuses on the individual's acceptance of risk.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation involving volens, consider the following steps:
Document all communications regarding consent and risks.
Consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and options.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that may assist you in documenting consent or waivers.
In complex cases, seeking professional legal help is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.