We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
What is Splitting a Cause of Action and Its Legal Implications?
Definition & Meaning
Splitting a cause of action refers to the practice of dividing a legal claim into separate parts and pursuing them in different lawsuits. This means that a plaintiff may present only a portion of their claim in one case, while reserving the remaining parts for a subsequent lawsuit. However, this approach is generally viewed as procedurally improper in most legal contexts.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This term is primarily used in civil litigation, where a party may have multiple claims arising from the same set of facts. Courts typically discourage splitting causes of action to promote judicial efficiency and prevent inconsistent judgments. Legal forms related to claims may be available through platforms like US Legal Forms, allowing individuals to manage their legal actions more effectively.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
For instance, if a person is injured in a car accident and suffers both physical injuries and property damage, they might be tempted to file one lawsuit for the physical injuries and another for the property damage. However, this could be considered splitting a cause of action, which may lead to complications in court.
(Hypothetical example) A business owner could have a claim against a supplier for breach of contract and also for damages caused by defective goods. If they file separate lawsuits for each claim, they risk having one dismissed due to improper splitting.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Legal Stance on Splitting Causes of Action
California
Generally prohibits splitting causes of action to avoid multiple lawsuits.
New York
Similar prohibition exists; courts encourage comprehensive claims in one lawsuit.
Texas
Allows some splitting under specific circumstances, but generally discouraged.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Cause of action
A legal reason to sue.
Splitting involves dividing a single cause into multiple lawsuits.
Joinder
The joining of multiple claims or parties in one lawsuit.
Joinder combines claims, while splitting separates them.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe your situation involves splitting a cause of action, it's advisable to consult with a legal professional. They can provide guidance specific to your case. Additionally, you may explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you file your claims properly and efficiently.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.