Understanding Qui Non Prohibet Quod Prohibere Potest, Assentire Videtur: A Legal Insight

Definition & Meaning

The phrase qui non prohibet quod prohibere potest, assentire videtur translates to "he who does not forbid what he can forbid is understood to assent." This legal maxim suggests that if a person has the authority to prevent an action but chooses not to, it is assumed they agree with that action. This principle is often applied in various legal contexts, indicating a tacit approval based on inaction.

Table of content

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

  • Example 1: A homeowner notices a neighbor consistently parking in front of their house. If the homeowner does not address this issue, they may be seen as accepting the neighbor's behavior (hypothetical example).
  • Example 2: In a workplace, if a manager is aware of an employee's repeated tardiness but does not address it, the manager may be perceived as approving the behavior.

State-by-state differences

Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):

State Application of the Maxim
California Generally applies in contract disputes.
New York Often referenced in property disputes.
Texas Used in family law cases regarding consent.

This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.

Comparison with related terms

Term Definition Difference
Implied Consent Consent inferred from actions rather than explicit agreement. Implied consent may arise from actions, while this maxim focuses on the failure to prohibit.
Assent Agreement to a proposal or decision. This maxim specifically addresses inaction as a form of assent.

What to do if this term applies to you

If you find yourself in a situation where this maxim may apply, consider the following steps:

  • Document any relevant actions or inactions.
  • Consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and obligations.
  • Explore US Legal Forms for templates that may assist you in formalizing your position.

Quick facts

Attribute Details
Typical Use Contract and property disputes
Key Principle Inaction can imply consent
Legal Areas Civil law, family law

Key takeaways

Frequently asked questions

It means that if someone has the power to stop something but doesn't, it is assumed they agree with it.