We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding New and Independent Cause in Legal Context
Definition & Meaning
The term "new and independent cause" refers to an event or action by a separate entity that disrupts the direct link between a defendant's negligence and the injury suffered by the plaintiff. In simpler terms, if a new factor arises that is not related to the defendant's actions, it can break the chain of causation, meaning the defendant may not be held liable for the injury. This concept is important in personal injury cases, as it helps determine responsibility for damages.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This term is primarily used in civil law, particularly in personal injury cases. It helps establish whether a defendant can be held liable for damages when an independent event occurs after their negligent act. Legal practitioners often analyze this concept when assessing liability in cases involving accidents, medical malpractice, or product liability. Users can manage related legal processes using templates from US Legal Forms, which provide guidance on filing claims or defenses.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A driver runs a red light and collides with another vehicle. However, shortly after the collision, a third party causes a further accident that complicates the injuries sustained by the original victim. The actions of the third party may be considered a new and independent cause.
Example 2: A patient suffers an injury due to a doctor's negligence. If the patient later sustains additional injuries from a fall caused by a sudden medical condition unrelated to the doctor's care, the fall may be viewed as a new and independent cause. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Variation
California
Recognizes comparative negligence, which may affect how new and independent causes are evaluated.
Texas
Emphasizes the need for clear evidence that the new cause broke the chain of causation.
New York
Focuses on whether the intervening act was foreseeable to determine liability.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Intervening Cause
An event that occurs after a defendant's negligent act that contributes to the plaintiff's injury.
Proximate Cause
The primary cause that directly leads to the injury, without any intervening causes.
Negligence
A failure to take proper care in doing something, resulting in damage or injury to another.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe a new and independent cause has affected your case, consider the following steps:
Document all relevant events and actions that occurred after the initial incident.
Consult with a legal professional to assess how this concept may impact your case.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you draft necessary documents or claims.
If your situation is complex, seek professional legal advice to navigate potential challenges.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.