The leading-object rule is a principle in contract law that states a promise made to guarantee another person's debt may not require a written agreement if the promise primarily benefits the promisor. This means that if the promisor's main goal is to gain an economic advantage rather than to help the third party, the statute of frauds does not apply. This rule is also referred to as the main purpose rule.
The leading-object rule is commonly applied in contract law, particularly in cases involving guarantees of debts. It is relevant in civil law contexts where individuals or businesses enter into agreements that involve financial obligations. Users may encounter this rule when dealing with contracts that do not require formal writing due to the nature of the promise made. Legal templates from US Legal Forms can assist users in drafting agreements that comply with this principle.
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A business owner promises to pay a loan taken out by a supplier because they want to ensure a steady supply of materials for their own benefit. Since the owner's primary motivation is to secure their own business interests, the leading-object rule may apply.
Example 2: An individual guarantees a friend's debt to a bank, but their main motivation is to maintain a good relationship with the friend, which indirectly benefits them. This situation may also fall under the leading-object rule.
Key cases illustrating the leading-object rule include:
| State | Application of Leading-Object Rule |
|---|---|
| California | Generally follows the leading-object rule, allowing oral promises if primarily for the promisor's benefit. |
| New York | Also recognizes the leading-object rule, emphasizing the economic advantage to the promisor. |
| Texas | Applies the leading-object rule, but specific circumstances may require written agreements. |
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
| Term | Definition | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Main Purpose Rule | A rule similar to the leading-object rule, focusing on the primary benefit to the promisor. | Essentially synonymous; both emphasize the promisor's benefit. |
| Statute of Frauds | A legal doctrine requiring certain contracts to be in writing. | The leading-object rule provides an exception to this requirement. |
If you find yourself in a situation where the leading-object rule may apply, consider the following steps:
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
It is a principle in contract law that allows oral guarantees if they primarily benefit the promisor.