What is the Per Se Rule? A Comprehensive Overview

Q: What types of practices are covered by the per se rule?

Common practices include price-fixing, market division, and bid-rigging.

Q: How does the per se rule differ from the rule of reason?

The per se rule does not require proof of harm, while the rule of reason evaluates the actual effects of a practice on competition.

Definition & Meaning

The per se rule is a legal principle in antitrust law that states certain business practices are inherently illegal under the Sherman Act, regardless of their actual impact on competition or harm to consumers. This rule simplifies legal proceedings by categorizing specific actions as violations without needing extensive evidence of their effects on the market. The Sherman Act, enacted in 1890, aims to maintain free competition in interstate commerce by prohibiting various forms of trade restraints.

Table of content

Legal Use & context

The per se rule is primarily used in antitrust cases, where the focus is on maintaining competitive markets. It applies to practices such as price-fixing, market division, and bid-rigging. Legal practitioners often rely on this rule to quickly establish that certain behaviors are unlawful, which can expedite litigation. Users may find it beneficial to access legal templates and resources from US Legal Forms to navigate related legal processes effectively.

Key legal elements

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

One example of the per se rule in action is a group of competing companies agreeing to set prices for their products at a certain level. This agreement is considered illegal under antitrust law, regardless of whether it leads to higher prices for consumers. Another example is when two companies agree to divide markets to avoid competing with each other, which is also a violation of the per se rule.

Relevant laws & statutes

The primary statute related to the per se rule is the Sherman Act of 1890. This federal law prohibits monopolistic practices and any agreements that restrain trade. Notable case law interpreting the per se rule includes United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. and California v. American Stores Co., which established key precedents regarding price-fixing and market division.

Comparison with related terms

Term	Definition	Key Differences
Per Se Rule	Certain practices are illegal regardless of their effects.	No need to demonstrate actual harm.
Rule of Reason	Practices are evaluated based on their actual effects on competition.	Requires evidence of harm or benefit to competition.

Common misunderstandings

What to do if this term applies to you

If you suspect that a business practice may violate the per se rule, it's important to document your observations and seek legal advice. You can explore US Legal Forms for templates that may help you address your concerns effectively. If the situation is complex or involves significant legal implications, consulting a legal professional is recommended.

Find the legal form that fits your case

Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.

This field is required

Quick facts

Attribute	Details
Jurisdiction	Federal law, applicable across all states
Typical Penalties	Fines, injunctions, and potential criminal charges
Common Violations	Price-fixing, market division, bid-rigging

Key takeaways

Frequently asked questions

What is the per se rule?

The per se rule is a legal principle that deems certain business practices illegal without needing to demonstrate their harmful effects on competition.