We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding Interference Proceedings (Trademark) in Trademark Law
Definition & Meaning
Interference proceedings in trademark law are legal actions initiated before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to resolve disputes over the priority of trademark use. These proceedings are rarely used and are reserved for exceptional cases where the issue of who used a trademark first cannot be effectively addressed through more common methods, such as opposition or cancellation proceedings. The Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks declares these proceedings upon receiving a petition. The primary focus is to determine which party has the rightful claim to a trademark based on their first use.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Interference proceedings are utilized in the field of trademark law, particularly when two parties claim rights to the same trademark. They are applicable only to trademarks registered on the Principal Register. Users may encounter this term when dealing with trademark disputes, especially if they are considering filing for a trademark or if they are involved in a conflict over trademark rights. Individuals can manage the process using legal templates from US Legal Forms, which are drafted by qualified attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
(Hypothetical example) If two businesses, Company A and Company B, both use the name "Fresh Bites" for their food products, but Company A has been using it since 2015 and registered the trademark in 2016, while Company B began using it in 2020 and has not registered it, Company A may initiate an interference proceeding to assert their priority of use.
Relevant laws & statutes
Pursuant to 15 USCS § 1066, interference proceedings are governed by federal trademark law, which outlines the procedures and requirements for establishing priority of use in trademark disputes.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Opposition
A challenge to a trademark application before it is granted.
Opposition occurs before registration, while interference proceedings occur after registration.
Cancellation
A request to remove a registered trademark from the Principal Register.
Cancellation seeks to invalidate a trademark, whereas interference determines priority of use.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation involving potential interference proceedings, consider the following steps:
Gather evidence of your trademark use, including dates and marketing materials.
Consult with a trademark attorney to evaluate your case and options.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates related to trademark disputes to assist in preparing your petition.
Professional legal help may be necessary for complex cases.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.