Interference refers to a legal process used in patent law to determine which of two or more applicants is the rightful inventor of the same invention. This proceeding can occur among multiple applicants, between patent holders, or between an applicant and an existing patent holder. The goal is to establish the legal rights to the invention based on the evidence presented regarding the claims of invention.
Interference is primarily used in the context of patent law. It arises when two or more parties claim rights to the same invention, which can lead to disputes over patent applications. This process is crucial in ensuring that the correct inventor is recognized legally, thereby protecting intellectual property rights. Users can often manage related forms and procedures through resources like US Legal Forms, which provide templates for patent applications and related legal documents.
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: Two researchers at different universities independently develop a new type of solar panel. Both file patent applications for the same invention. An interference proceeding is initiated to determine who can claim the patent.
Example 2: A small business owner applies for a patent on a unique software program, but later discovers that a competitor has also filed for a patent on a similar program. The business owner may pursue an interference action to assert their rights. (hypothetical example)
| Term | Definition | Differences |
|---|---|---|
| Interference | A legal proceeding to determine the rightful inventor among multiple claims. | Focuses on inventorship disputes in patent applications. |
| Opposition | A process where a third party challenges the validity of a patent after it has been granted. | Occurs post-grant, while interference happens pre-grant. |
| Reexamination | A procedure to review the validity of an issued patent based on new evidence. | Involves existing patents, not competing applications. |
If you find yourself in a situation where interference may apply, consider the following steps:
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
The proceeding involves presenting evidence and arguments to determine who is the rightful inventor.