We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Concurrent Use Proceeding: A Comprehensive Guide to Trademark Law
Definition & Meaning
A concurrent use proceeding is a legal process overseen by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) that allows multiple parties to register similar trademarks while limiting their rights to specific geographic areas. This process is initiated when an applicant seeks a concurrent use registration, which is a type of trademark registration that acknowledges the existence of another party using a similar mark. The TTAB reviews the application and notifies the other party, giving them forty days to respond. If the other party does not respond, the limitations set forth in the application can be entered as a judgment.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Concurrent use proceedings are primarily used in trademark law. They are relevant when two or more parties claim rights to similar trademarks in different geographic regions. This process helps resolve disputes over trademark rights and can prevent confusion in the marketplace. Users can manage aspects of this process themselves using legal templates from US Legal Forms, which can provide the necessary documents for filing and responding to concurrent use proceedings.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A coffee shop in New York named "Brewed Awakenings" applies for concurrent use registration while a similarly named coffee shop in California operates under the same name. The TTAB reviews the application and notifies the California shop, allowing them to respond.
Example 2: A clothing brand in Texas uses the trademark "Star Fashion" and applies for a concurrent use registration while another brand in Florida has been using the same mark. The TTAB will determine if both parties can coexist with their trademarks in their respective states. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Notes
California
Concurrent use proceedings are common due to the high number of trademark applications.
Texas
State laws may influence the geographic limitations in concurrent use cases.
New York
New York has specific regulations regarding trademark coexistence that may impact concurrent use proceedings.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Differences
Opposition
A legal challenge to a trademark application by a third party.
Opposition occurs before registration, while concurrent use proceedings address existing registrations.
Cancellation
A legal action to remove a registered trademark from the registry.
Cancellation seeks to invalidate a trademark, whereas concurrent use allows coexistence under certain conditions.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are involved in a concurrent use proceeding, consider the following steps:
Review the notice you received carefully and understand the limitations proposed.
Prepare a response within the forty-day timeframe if you believe you have valid rights to your trademark.
Consult with a trademark attorney for guidance, especially if the situation is complex.
You can also explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you draft your response or application.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.