What should I do if I receive a citation for a law I didn't know existed?

Review the law and consider consulting a legal professional for guidance.

US Legal Forms
Legal definitions
I
Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat

Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat: The Legal Principle of Ignorance of Law

Q: Does this principle apply to civil cases?

Yes, it applies to both civil and criminal matters.

Definition & Meaning

The phrase "ignorance of the law is not an excuse" is a legal principle stating that individuals are expected to know the laws that govern their actions. This maxim, known as "ignorantia juris non excusat," applies to both criminal and civil law in the United States. It emphasizes that everyone is responsible for understanding the laws relevant to their conduct, regardless of whether they claim ignorance. The rationale behind this principle is to prevent individuals from evading legal responsibility by simply stating they were unaware of a specific law.

Table of content

Legal Use & context

This principle is widely recognized in legal practice and is applicable in various areas, including:

Criminal Law: Individuals cannot avoid criminal charges by claiming ignorance of the law.
Civil Law: Ignorance of civil statutes does not exempt individuals from liability in lawsuits.
Chancery Law: Courts of chancery also uphold this maxim, emphasizing its broad applicability.

Users can manage certain legal issues related to this principle using legal forms and templates available through services like US Legal Forms, which provide resources drafted by qualified attorneys.

Key legal elements

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

Here are a couple of examples illustrating this principle:

A person receives a traffic ticket for speeding and claims they were unaware of the speed limit. The court will likely uphold the ticket, as ignorance of the law does not excuse the violation.
A business owner fails to comply with a local zoning law and is fined. The owner cannot argue they were unaware of the law to avoid penalties. (hypothetical example)

State-by-state differences

Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):

State	Application of the Principle
California	Strictly enforces the principle in both civil and criminal cases.
New York	Recognizes this principle in municipal law cases.
Texas	Applies the principle broadly, including in civil liability cases.

This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.

Comparison with related terms

Term	Definition	Difference
Ignorance of Law	Not knowing the law does not excuse legal liability.	Applies universally across legal systems.
Ignorance of Fact	Not knowing a fact may be a valid defense in some cases.	Can excuse liability if it negates intent.

Common misunderstandings

What to do if this term applies to you

If you find yourself in a situation where you may be held liable for a breach of law, consider the following steps:

Review the relevant laws and regulations to understand your obligations.
Consult with a legal professional if you're unsure about your rights or responsibilities.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you manage your legal issues effectively.

In complex matters, seeking professional legal assistance is advisable.

Find the legal form that fits your case

Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.

This field is required

Quick facts

Typical Fees: Varies by case and jurisdiction.
Jurisdiction: Applies nationwide in the U.S.
Possible Penalties: Fines, legal liability, or criminal charges.

Key takeaways

Frequently asked questions

Can I be charged with a crime if I didn't know it was illegal?

Yes, ignorance of the law does not exempt you from criminal charges.