We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Injuria Non Excusat Injuriam: The Principle of Accountability in Law
Definition & Meaning
The phrase "injuria non excusat injuriam" translates to "a wrong does not excuse a wrong." This legal principle asserts that one wrongful act cannot justify another. In essence, if someone wrongs you, you are not legally permitted to retaliate with another wrongful act. Each individual is accountable for their actions, regardless of the wrongs they may have suffered. Therefore, if a person commits a wrongful act, they cannot use the wrong they experienced as a defense against the consequences of their own actions.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This principle is commonly referenced in various areas of law, including civil and criminal law. It serves as a reminder that individuals should not take the law into their own hands. In legal practice, this concept can affect cases involving personal injury, property disputes, and even criminal offenses. Users may find it useful to access legal templates from US Legal Forms to navigate situations where this principle applies, ensuring they handle their cases appropriately and legally.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
1. If a person is assaulted in a bar and later retaliates by attacking the assailant, they cannot use the initial assault as a legal defense for their actions. (hypothetical example)
2. In a property dispute, if one neighbor damages another's fence due to a prior dispute, the damage caused cannot be justified by the earlier conflict. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Notes
California
Considers provocation in some civil cases but does not excuse wrongful retaliation.
Texas
Similar principles apply, with specific statutes addressing self-defense and retaliation.
New York
Emphasizes personal accountability and does not allow retaliation as a defense.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Self-defense
The right to protect oneself from harm.
Self-defense is a legal justification for using force, while injuria non excusat injuriam emphasizes accountability for wrongful actions.
Retaliation
Acting against someone in response to a perceived wrong.
Retaliation is not legally justified under this principle, as it recognizes that two wrongs do not make a right.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation where you feel wronged, it's crucial to avoid taking retaliatory actions. Instead, consider the following steps:
Document the incident and gather evidence.
Consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and options.
Explore legal templates on US Legal Forms to manage your case effectively.
In complex situations, seeking professional legal help is recommended to ensure your actions are legally sound.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.