Heartbalm Statutes: A Comprehensive Guide to Their Legal Definition

Q: Can I sue for emotional distress after a breakup?

Generally, no. Many states have heartbalm statutes that prevent such lawsuits.

Q: Which states have heartbalm statutes?

Many states, including California, New York, and Texas, have abolished these claims through heartbalm statutes.

Definition & Meaning

Heartbalm statutes are laws enacted by various states that eliminate the ability to seek monetary damages for emotional distress resulting from the end of romantic relationships. These statutes specifically abolish certain legal claims, including:

Alienation of affections
Breach of promise to marry
Criminal conversation
Seduction of a person over the legal age of consent

The primary reason for these statutes is to prevent speculative claims and potential abuse of the legal system, as it can be challenging to determine the actual cause of emotional harm in such cases.

Table of content

Legal Use & context

Heartbalm statutes are relevant in family law and civil litigation. They are used to address claims related to emotional distress from romantic relationships. Since these laws abolish specific causes of action, individuals cannot pursue legal remedies for emotional trauma caused by the loss of love. Users can manage related issues through legal forms provided by platforms like US Legal Forms, which offer templates for other family law matters.

Key legal elements

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

Example 1: A person cannot sue their former partner for alienation of affections if their partner leaves them for someone else, as this claim is abolished under heartbalm statutes.

Example 2: A person who was promised marriage but was later abandoned cannot seek damages for breach of promise to marry due to the heartbalm statutes in their state.

Relevant laws & statutes

Heartbalm statutes vary by state, but many states have enacted laws that abolish the aforementioned claims. Some notable examples include:

California Family Code § 170
New York Civil Rights Law § 80
Texas Family Code § 1.107

State-by-state differences

State	Heartbalm Statute Status
California	Abolished
New York	Abolished
Texas	Abolished

This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.

Comparison with related terms

Term	Definition	Comparison
Alienation of affections	A claim against a third party for interfering in a romantic relationship.	Abolished by heartbalm statutes.
Breach of promise to marry	A claim for damages when one party breaks a promise to marry.	Abolished by heartbalm statutes.

Common misunderstandings

What to do if this term applies to you

If you believe you have a case related to emotional distress due to a relationship issue, first determine if your state has heartbalm statutes that may affect your ability to sue. If you need to address other family law matters, consider exploring US Legal Forms for ready-to-use legal templates. For complex situations, it may be beneficial to consult a legal professional for tailored advice.

Find the legal form that fits your case

Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.

This field is required

Quick facts

Heartbalm statutes abolish certain emotional distress claims.
Applicable primarily in family law contexts.
Statutes vary by state.
Claims must be based on tangible evidence.

Key takeaways

Frequently asked questions

What are heartbalm statutes?

Heartbalm statutes are laws that abolish certain claims for emotional distress resulting from romantic relationship issues.