We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
What is Fraudulent Preference? A Comprehensive Legal Overview
Definition & Meaning
Fraudulent preference occurs when a company favors one creditor over others, giving that creditor an undue advantage during a time when the company cannot pay its debts. This practice is considered unfair because it places the favored creditor in a better position than they would otherwise be in. Under the Bankruptcy Act, such preferences can be challenged and deemed voidable, meaning they can be reversed in bankruptcy proceedings.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This term is primarily used in bankruptcy law. It comes into play when a debtor company makes payments or transfers assets to one creditor shortly before filing for bankruptcy, potentially disadvantaging other creditors. Legal professionals often assess these transactions to determine whether they can be reversed. Users can manage some aspects of this process with the right legal forms, such as those provided by US Legal Forms, which can assist in documenting and challenging fraudulent preferences.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A company facing financial difficulties pays off a loan to a bank just weeks before declaring bankruptcy. This payment might be considered a fraudulent preference if it puts the bank in a better position than other creditors.
Example 2: A business transfers a significant asset to a friend who is a creditor shortly before filing for bankruptcy. This could also be challenged as a fraudulent preference. (hypothetical example)
Relevant laws & statutes
The primary legal framework governing fraudulent preferences is found in the Bankruptcy Code, specifically under Section 547. This section outlines the conditions under which a transfer can be deemed a fraudulent preference and the legal remedies available to other creditors.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Difference
Fraudulent Conveyance
A transfer of property made to avoid creditors.
Fraudulent preference specifically favors one creditor over others, while fraudulent conveyance may not involve a creditor preference.
Preferential Payment
A payment made to one creditor over others.
Fraudulent preference is a legal term that implies intent to disadvantage others, while preferential payment may not carry that implication.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe you have been unfairly treated as a creditor or are concerned about a potential fraudulent preference, it is important to gather relevant documentation of transactions. Consulting with a legal professional can provide clarity and guidance. Additionally, you can explore US Legal Forms for templates that may help you navigate the process of challenging a fraudulent preference.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Typical time frame for challenging a preference: 90 days for general creditors, one year for insiders.
Jurisdiction: Governed by federal bankruptcy law.
Possible outcomes: Reversal of the transaction, recovery of funds for the bankruptcy estate.
Key takeaways
Frequently asked questions
A fraudulent preference occurs when a debtor favors one creditor over others during insolvency, which can be legally challenged.
You can challenge a fraudulent preference by documenting the transaction and consulting with a legal professional who can guide you through the process.
If deemed fraudulent, the transaction can be reversed, and the funds may need to be returned to the bankruptcy estate.