We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Doctrine of Election: A Key Legal Principle
Definition & Meaning
The doctrine of election is a legal principle that applies when a person enters into a contract with an agent without knowing the identity of the principal (the person the agent represents). Once the person discovers who the principal is, they must choose whether to enforce the contract against the agent or the principal, but not both. This choice is known as "election." The doctrine ensures that a party cannot hold both the agent and the principal liable for the same obligation.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This doctrine is primarily used in contract law and agency law. It is relevant in situations where a contract is formed without full knowledge of the parties involved. Users may encounter this principle in various legal contexts, including:
Business transactions
Real estate agreements
Employment contracts
Individuals can manage some aspects of these situations using legal templates provided by US Legal Forms, drafted by qualified attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A person hires a contractor to build a deck, not knowing that the contractor is acting on behalf of a property owner. Once they learn the owner's identity, they must decide whether to pursue the contractor or the owner for any issues with the contract.
Example 2: A buyer purchases a car through a dealership, unaware that the dealership is acting as an agent for the car's manufacturer. Upon discovering this, the buyer must choose to enforce the warranty against either the dealership or the manufacturer, but not both. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Variation
California
Recognizes the doctrine of election in agency relationships but has specific consumer protection laws that may affect enforcement.
New York
Similar principles apply, but courts may interpret the election differently based on the circumstances of the case.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Agency
A relationship where one person (the agent) acts on behalf of another (the principal).
The doctrine of election specifically addresses the choice between enforcing a contract against the agent or principal.
Principal
The person who authorizes an agent to act on their behalf.
The principal is the party whose identity may be unknown at the time of contracting, leading to the application of the doctrine of election.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation where the doctrine of election may apply, consider the following steps:
Review the contract and identify whether an agent was involved.
Determine if you are aware of the principal's identity.
Decide which party you want to pursue for enforcement of the contract.
Consider using legal templates from US Legal Forms to assist in drafting necessary documents.
If the situation is complex, seek professional legal advice to ensure your rights are protected.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.