Understanding the Doctrine of Coercion: A Historical Legal Perspective
Definition & Meaning
The doctrine of coercion was a common law principle that presumed a partner, typically a wife, was coerced into committing a crime if it occurred in the presence of their spouse. This doctrine provided a complete defense against criminal charges, suggesting that the partner acted under duress. However, this doctrine has been abolished by the courts and is no longer applicable in modern legal contexts.
Legal Use & context
The doctrine of coercion was primarily relevant in criminal law, particularly in cases involving domestic relationships. It suggested that individuals could not be held fully accountable for their actions if they were compelled by their partner. With its abolition, current legal practices emphasize individual accountability, regardless of the presence of a partner during the commission of a crime. Users may find legal templates useful for various criminal defense strategies, but the doctrine of coercion itself is no longer a viable defense.
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A partner is charged with theft that occurred while their spouse was present. Under the doctrine of coercion, the partner could argue they were forced to participate in the crime due to their spouse's influence. (hypothetical example)
Example 2: A partner involved in a drug-related offense might claim they were coerced by their spouse. However, since the doctrine has been abolished, this defense would not hold in court.