We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Marital Coercion: A Comprehensive Guide to Its Legal Implications
Definition & Meaning
Marital coercion refers to the situation where a spouse, typically a wife, is compelled to act under the influence or pressure of their partner, usually the husband. This concept is recognized in legal contexts as a defense against criminal charges, suggesting that a wife's actions taken in the presence of her husband may be viewed as involuntary due to his coercive influence. The legal principle allows for the possibility that a wife may not be fully responsible for her actions if they occur under marital coercion, especially in cases involving torts or wrongful acts.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Marital coercion is primarily used in criminal and family law contexts. It serves as a defense in criminal cases where a spouse may argue that their actions were not voluntary due to coercion from their partner. This concept can also arise in civil cases involving torts where a married woman is accused of wrongdoing. Users can manage related legal matters by utilizing legal templates from US Legal Forms, which provide guidance on how to assert this defense in court.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
(hypothetical example) A wife is accused of theft after taking items from a store while shopping with her husband. If she can demonstrate that her husband pressured her to commit the theft, claiming that he would harm her if she did not comply, she may argue marital coercion as a defense.
(hypothetical example) A woman is charged with assault after an altercation at a party. If she can show that her husband coerced her into engaging in the fight, she may use marital coercion as part of her defense strategy.
State-by-state differences
State
Marital Coercion Recognition
California
Recognizes marital coercion as a defense in criminal cases.
New York
Allows marital coercion to be argued in civil tort cases.
Texas
Limited recognition; requires strong evidence of coercion.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Duress
Coercion through threats or force.
Duress applies to all individuals, while marital coercion specifically involves spouses.
Consent
Agreement to an action or decision.
Marital coercion negates true consent due to pressure from a partner.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe you have been coerced into actions by your partner, it is essential to gather evidence of the coercion. This may include witness statements or documentation of threats. Consulting a legal professional can provide guidance on how to proceed. Additionally, you can explore US Legal Forms for templates that may assist in asserting your defense in court.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.