We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Doctrine of Revestment: A Key Legal Principle
Definition & Meaning
The doctrine of revestment is a legal principle that allows a court to regain jurisdiction after a final judgment has been issued. This occurs when the parties involved take part in actions or proceedings that contradict the court's previous judgment, without raising any objections. For the doctrine to be applicable, both parties must actively engage in these inconsistent proceedings. As a result, the court can re-establish its authority, even if the usual time frame for filing post-judgment motions has expired, which is typically 30 days. While the doctrine itself is straightforward, its application can be complex.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The doctrine of revestment is primarily used in civil litigation. It is relevant in cases where parties may inadvertently waive their rights by participating in actions that contradict a court's ruling. Users may find this principle applicable in various legal contexts, including family law, contract disputes, and property cases. Understanding how to navigate these situations can be crucial, and users can benefit from legal templates provided by US Legal Forms to manage their cases effectively.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
(hypothetical example) A court issues a final judgment in a divorce case, awarding custody of a child to one parent. If both parents later agree to a different custody arrangement and present this to the court without objection, the court may reassert its jurisdiction under the doctrine of revestment to modify the custody order.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Application of Doctrine
California
Generally follows the doctrine, allowing revestment under similar conditions.
New York
Recognizes the doctrine but may have specific procedural requirements.
Texas
Applies the doctrine with a focus on the parties' actions post-judgment.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Jurisdiction
The authority of a court to hear a case.
Revestment specifically refers to regaining jurisdiction after a final judgment.
Final Judgment
A court's last decision in a case.
Revestment occurs after a final judgment when parties act inconsistently with it.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation where the doctrine of revestment may apply, consider the following steps:
Review the actions taken after the final judgment to determine if they contradict the judgment.
Consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and options.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you navigate post-judgment procedures effectively.
In complex situations, seeking professional legal advice is highly recommended.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.