We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding Chronically Low-Performing High School: Legal Definitions and Criteria
Definition & Meaning
A chronically low-performing high school is a public high school that has a graduation rate of less than sixty percent for three consecutive years. This designation is based on criteria established by the National Governors Association's Compact on High School Graduation Data. Additionally, a school may be classified as chronically low-performing if it fails to make adequate yearly progress for three consecutive years, as defined by the Office of Student Achievement. Furthermore, schools with a significant percentage of students"typically twenty percent or more"failing to meet proficiency levels in reading or mathematics for more than two consecutive years, as outlined under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, are also considered chronically low-performing.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The term "chronically low-performing high school" is primarily used in the context of education law and policy. It is relevant to discussions about educational equity, funding, and intervention strategies aimed at improving school performance. Legal practitioners may encounter this term when dealing with cases related to educational rights, school funding disputes, or compliance with federal education standards. Users may find it beneficial to utilize legal templates available through US Legal Forms to navigate related legal processes effectively.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A high school in a large urban district has a graduation rate of fifty-five percent for three years in a row. It also reports that thirty percent of its students are not proficient in mathematics. As a result, this school is classified as chronically low-performing.
Example 2: A rural high school has struggled with a graduation rate of fifty-eight percent for three consecutive years and has not met the required proficiency levels in reading for over two years. This situation qualifies it as a chronically low-performing high school. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Criteria for Classification
California
Graduation rates below sixty percent for three years, plus additional state-specific metrics.
Texas
Similar graduation rate criteria, with additional emphasis on standardized test performance.
Florida
Graduation rates and proficiency levels in reading and mathematics are considered, with state intervention programs available.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are a parent or guardian of a student attending a chronically low-performing high school, consider the following steps:
Engage with school administrators to understand the specific challenges the school is facing.
Explore available resources and programs that may assist in improving your child's educational experience.
Consider utilizing US Legal Forms to access legal templates that can help you navigate educational rights and options.
If the situation is complex, seeking advice from a legal professional may be beneficial.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Less than sixty percent for three consecutive years
Proficiency Rate Threshold
Twenty percent or more failing in reading or mathematics
Intervention Requirements
Varies by state; may include additional support and resources
Key takeaways
Frequently asked questions
This classification indicates that the school has struggled with low graduation rates and student proficiency levels, which may affect the quality of education provided.
Yes, schools can improve through targeted interventions, increased funding, and community support.
Resources may include tutoring programs, after-school activities, and additional academic support services.