We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
The Blue-Pencil Test: A Key Legal Standard for Contract Validity
Definition & Meaning
The blue-pencil test is a legal standard used by courts to determine whether to invalidate an entire contract or only specific problematic sections. Under this test, if certain provisions of a contract are deemed unreasonable, they can be removed without altering the remaining text. This approach allows courts to strike out offending words simply, much like drawing a blue pencil through them, rather than modifying or rearranging the contract's language.
However, many courts have shifted away from the blue-pencil test, opting instead for a "reasonableness" standard. This newer approach allows courts to assess the overall context and intentions of the parties involved, ensuring that any modifications made to the contract are reasonable and reflect the original agreement.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The blue-pencil test is primarily used in contract law, particularly in cases involving employment agreements and non-compete clauses. It helps courts decide whether to enforce or invalidate specific terms based on their reasonableness. Users can manage related forms and contracts using resources like US Legal Forms, which provide templates drafted by legal professionals.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A company includes a non-compete clause in an employment contract that lasts for five years. A court may find this duration unreasonable and apply the blue-pencil test to strike out the clause, allowing the rest of the contract to remain valid.
Example 2: A contract states that an employee cannot work in any related field for ten years. If deemed excessive, the court may remove this clause, ensuring the employee can work in their field sooner (hypothetical example).
State-by-state differences
State
Application of Blue-Pencil Test
California
Generally favors the reasonableness standard over the blue-pencil test.
Ohio
Still applies the blue-pencil test in certain cases, particularly in employment contracts.
New York
Utilizes a reasonableness standard, similar to California.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Description
Difference
Blue-Pencil Test
A method for removing unreasonable provisions from a contract.
Only allows striking out terms, not modifying them.
Reasonableness Standard
A flexible approach allowing courts to modify contracts based on reasonableness.
Permits amendments and adjustments to reflect the parties' intentions.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself dealing with a contract that may contain unreasonable provisions, consider the following steps:
Review the contract carefully to identify any problematic clauses.
Consult with a legal professional to understand your options and the potential application of the blue-pencil test.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that may help you draft or modify contracts appropriately.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.