Understanding the Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison Test in Copyright Law

Definition & Meaning

The abstraction-filtration-comparison test is a legal method used to assess whether two computer programs are substantially similar in their non-literal elements. This test is primarily applied in copyright infringement cases. It involves breaking down a computer program into various levels of abstraction, filtering out unprotected elements, and then comparing the remaining protected elements with those of the allegedly infringing program to determine if there has been misappropriation.

Table of content

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

Example 1: A software company develops a unique application for managing personal finances. Another company releases a similar application that closely resembles the protected features of the original. In this case, the original developer may use the abstraction-filtration-comparison test to argue that their program's protected elements were copied.

Example 2: A game developer creates a new video game with unique gameplay mechanics. If a competitor releases a game that appears to replicate those mechanics, the original developer may employ the test to demonstrate that substantial similarities exist between the two games. (hypothetical example)

Comparison with related terms

Term Definition Key Differences
Substantial Similarity The degree to which two works are alike in a way that is legally significant. Focuses on overall impression rather than specific elements.
Copyright Infringement The unauthorized use of copyrighted material. Infringement claims may not always involve the abstraction-filtration-comparison test.

What to do if this term applies to you

If you believe your software or program has been copied, consider the following steps:

  • Document your original work and any evidence of copying.
  • Consult with a legal professional who specializes in copyright law.
  • Explore US Legal Forms for templates that may assist you in filing a copyright infringement claim.
  • Be prepared to provide detailed comparisons of the programs involved.

Quick facts

  • Typical use: Copyright infringement cases
  • Key focus: Non-literal elements of programs
  • Legal standard: Substantial similarity
  • Potential outcomes: Cease and desist, damages

Key takeaways

Frequently asked questions

It is used to assess whether two programs are substantially similar in their protected elements.