We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding Article 78 Proceeding: A Comprehensive Legal Overview
Definition & meaning
An Article 78 proceeding is a legal process in New York that allows individuals to challenge the actions or decisions of government bodies or officials. Named after Article 78 of the New York Civil Practice Laws and Rules, this type of proceeding is typically used to seek relief from decisions that are deemed arbitrary, capricious, or made without proper jurisdiction. It is important to note that this proceeding cannot be used to contest non-final determinations or decisions made in civil or criminal cases, except in specific circumstances involving contempt orders.
Table of content
Legal use & context
Article 78 proceedings are primarily utilized in administrative law, allowing individuals to appeal decisions made by various government entities, including state agencies, municipalities, and public officers. This legal avenue is often relevant in cases involving zoning, licensing, or disciplinary actions against professionals. Users can manage their own Article 78 proceedings with the right legal forms, which are available through platforms like US Legal Forms, designed to assist individuals in navigating this process effectively.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A local business owner files an Article 78 proceeding after a city zoning board denies their application for a permit, arguing that the decision was arbitrary and not supported by evidence.
Example 2: A teacher challenges a school district's decision to suspend them, claiming that the disciplinary action was taken without following proper procedures (hypothetical example).
Relevant laws & statutes
The primary statute governing Article 78 proceedings is NY CLS CPLR § 7801, which outlines the nature of the proceeding and the types of relief available. Additional relevant sections include:
NY CLS CPLR § 7802: Defines the parties involved in the proceedings.
NY CLS CPLR § 7804: Details the procedural aspects of filing an Article 78 proceeding.
NY CLS CPLR § 7805: Discusses the court's authority to stay proceedings.
NY CLS CPLR § 7806: Outlines the judgment that may be granted.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Writ of Certiorari
A court order to review a lower court's decision.
Article 78 is a specific New York procedure, while certiorari is broader and used in various jurisdictions.
Mandamus
A court order compelling a government official to perform a duty.
Mandamus can be a remedy sought within an Article 78 proceeding.
Prohibition
A court order preventing a government body from acting beyond its authority.
Prohibition is also a remedy available under Article 78 but focuses on preventing action rather than reviewing it.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe you have grounds for an Article 78 proceeding, consider the following steps:
Review the decision you wish to challenge to ensure it is final and within the scope of Article 78.
Gather any evidence or documentation that supports your claim.
Consult with a legal professional to assess your case and navigate the filing process.
You can also explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you draft the necessary documents.
Find a legal form that suits your needs
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Judgment may annul, confirm, or modify the determination.
Time Limits
Must be filed within four months of the decision.
Key takeaways
FAQs
You generally have four months from the date of the decision to file an Article 78 proceeding.
Yes, you can represent yourself, but it is advisable to seek legal counsel due to the complexities involved.
Decisions made by government agencies or officials that are final and may be deemed arbitrary, capricious, or made without jurisdiction can be challenged.