We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
What is the Aliunde Rule? A Comprehensive Guide to Its Legal Definition
Definition & Meaning
The aliunde rule is a legal principle that prevents a jury's verdict from being challenged or questioned based solely on the testimony of a juror. For such testimony to be admissible, there must first be credible evidence from an external source to support the claim. This rule aims to maintain the integrity and finality of jury decisions, protecting jurors from potential harassment or undue influence from parties dissatisfied with the verdict.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The aliunde rule is primarily applied in the context of jury trials within the legal system. It is relevant in various areas of law, including civil, criminal, and family law. The rule is often invoked when a party seeks to overturn a jury's decision based on alleged misconduct or improper deliberations. Users may find it beneficial to utilize legal templates from US Legal Forms to navigate related procedures effectively.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: In a civil case, a party may claim that a juror was biased. However, under the aliunde rule, they cannot use the juror's testimony to prove this bias unless they present other evidence supporting their claim.
Example 2: A juror later admits to having discussed the case with an outsider. The aliunde rule would prevent this juror's statement from being used to overturn the verdict unless there is independent evidence of misconduct. (hypothetical example)
Relevant laws & statutes
Ohio Rule of Evidence 606(B) codifies the aliunde rule, stating that a jury's verdict cannot be impeached by juror testimony unless there is prior competent evidence from another source. This rule is reinforced by case law, such as State v. Adams, which highlights the importance of maintaining the integrity of jury decisions.
State-by-state differences
State
Aliunde Rule Status
Ohio
Codified in Rule 606(B)
California
Similar principles apply, but specific statutes may differ.
New York
Recognizes the rule but has specific exceptions.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Impeachment of Verdict
Challenging the validity of a jury's decision.
Aliunde rule requires external evidence first.
Juror Misconduct
Improper behavior by a juror during a trial.
Aliunde rule limits how this can be proven.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe the aliunde rule affects your case, consider gathering credible evidence from outside sources to support your claims. You may also want to explore legal templates available through US Legal Forms to assist in your legal processes. If the situation is complex, consulting with a legal professional is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Possible penalties: None directly related to the aliunde rule
Key takeaways
Frequently asked questions
The aliunde rule is a legal principle that prevents jurors from testifying about their deliberations unless there is external evidence to support the challenge.
Generally, no. Jurors cannot testify about their deliberations or challenge the verdict without prior competent evidence from another source.
Such admissions cannot be used to overturn a verdict unless supported by external evidence, as per the aliunde rule.