Exploring Afforcing the Assize: Historical Context and Legal Implications
Definition & Meaning
Afforcing the assize is an outdated legal practice from English law that involved adding additional jurors to a jury panel when the original jurors could not reach a unanimous verdict. This method aimed to prevent a hung jury by either withholding food and drink from the jurors until they made a decision or by introducing new jurors to help achieve a consensus. The practice was eventually abandoned as courts recognized that requiring a unanimous verdict would reduce delays and complications in the judicial process.
Legal Use & context
Afforcing the assize is primarily associated with jury trials in civil and criminal law. Although it is no longer in practice, understanding this term can be useful for those studying historical legal systems or exploring the evolution of jury processes. Users interested in jury-related issues may find relevant forms and templates on platforms like US Legal Forms, which can assist in managing legal documents related to jury trials.
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
(Hypothetical example) In a civil trial, if the jury is deadlocked after several days of deliberation, the court might have previously considered afforcing the assize by bringing in additional jurors to help reach a decision. However, under current practices, the jury would be instructed to continue deliberating until they can reach a unanimous verdict without adding new jurors.