We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Tort of Another Doctrine: A Key Legal Exception
Definition & Meaning
The tort of another doctrine is a legal principle that allows a plaintiff to recover attorney's fees from a defendant. This occurs when the plaintiff must hire a lawyer to pursue or defend a case against a third party due to the defendant's wrongful actions. Essentially, if the defendant's tortious behavior forces the plaintiff to take legal action involving someone else, the plaintiff can seek reimbursement for their legal costs. However, this doctrine only applies when there is clear tortious conduct by the defendant.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This doctrine is primarily used in civil litigation, where a plaintiff may need to engage legal counsel to address issues arising from a defendant's actions. It is relevant in various legal areas, including personal injury and property disputes. Users can manage related legal processes using templates available through US Legal Forms, which are drafted by licensed attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A person is injured in a car accident caused by a negligent driver. The injured party must sue the driver and, due to the circumstances, also needs to defend against a claim from a third party involved in the accident. Under the tort of another doctrine, the injured party can seek to recover attorney's fees from the negligent driver.
(Hypothetical example) Example 2: A tenant sues a landlord for failing to maintain the property, which leads to a third-party injury claim. The tenant hires a lawyer to defend against the third-party claim, and they can seek attorney's fees from the landlord based on the tort of another doctrine.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Notes
California
Recognizes the tort of another doctrine in personal injury cases.
New York
Allows recovery of attorney's fees under specific circumstances related to tortious conduct.
Texas
Limits recovery of attorney's fees to cases with clear tortious actions.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Differences
Indemnity
A duty to compensate for losses or damages incurred.
Indemnity involves compensation for losses, while the tort of another doctrine specifically addresses attorney's fees related to third-party claims.
Subrogation
The right of an insurer to pursue a third party for reimbursement.
Subrogation relates to insurance claims, whereas the tort of another doctrine focuses on legal fees incurred due to tortious actions.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe the tort of another doctrine applies to your situation, consider the following steps:
Document all legal fees incurred while pursuing or defending against a third party.
Gather evidence of the defendant's tortious conduct.
Consult with a legal professional to evaluate your case and determine the best course of action.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that may assist you in your legal processes.
For complex matters, seeking professional legal assistance is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
It is a legal principle that allows a plaintiff to recover attorneyâs fees from a defendant when the defendant's wrongful actions lead the plaintiff to engage legal counsel against a third party.
No, recovery is limited to fees incurred due to the defendant's tortious conduct.
While the doctrine is recognized in many states, specific applications and rules may vary. It's essential to check local laws.