We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
A technical error refers to a mistake made during legal proceedings that does not significantly harm the rights of any party involved. Such errors are typically procedural and do not affect the outcome of the case. According to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party cannot use a technical error as a valid reason to overturn a verdict or seek a new trial unless it has caused substantial harm.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Technical errors are primarily relevant in civil litigation but can also arise in other legal areas such as criminal and family law. They may involve issues related to the admission or exclusion of evidence, improper procedures, or clerical mistakes. Understanding technical errors is crucial for parties involved in legal proceedings, as recognizing these errors can help them navigate their cases more effectively. Users can utilize legal templates from US Legal Forms to address specific situations involving technical errors.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: During a trial, a judge incorrectly admits a piece of evidence that should have been excluded. However, the evidence does not significantly impact the jury's decision. As a result, this is considered a technical error.
Example 2: A court clerk mistakenly files a document in the wrong case, but this does not affect the outcome of the case being heard. This situation also qualifies as a technical error. (hypothetical example)
Relevant laws & statutes
Pursuant to USCS Fed Rules Civ Proc R 61, courts are instructed to disregard errors that do not affect any party's substantial rights. This rule emphasizes the importance of focusing on the merits of a case rather than minor procedural mistakes.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Substantive Error
An error that affects the fundamental rights of a party.
Unlike technical errors, substantive errors can lead to a reversal of a verdict.
Clerical Error
A mistake in the written record of a legal proceeding.
Clerical errors are often easily corrected and do not impact the trial's outcome.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe a technical error has occurred in your case, it's important to assess whether it affected your substantial rights. If it did not, you may not have grounds for an appeal. For assistance, consider using US Legal Forms to find templates that can help you address procedural issues. If the situation is complex, consulting with a legal professional is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.