The single-controversy doctrine is a legal principle that mandates a party involved in litigation to present all claims related to a single dispute in one legal action. If a litigant does not include all relevant claims in their initial lawsuit, they cannot bring those claims in a subsequent case. This doctrine aims to promote judicial efficiency and prevent repetitive litigation over the same issue.
This doctrine is primarily used in civil law cases, particularly in federal court settings where jurisdictional issues arise. It often applies in cases involving multiple claims that are interconnected, such as contract disputes or tort claims. By requiring all related claims to be filed together, the single-controversy doctrine helps streamline legal processes and reduce the burden on courts. Users can manage some aspects of these cases using legal forms provided by platforms like US Legal Forms, which offer templates for various legal actions.
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
For instance, if a person sues a contractor for breach of contract and also wants to claim damages for negligence related to the same project, they must include both claims in the same lawsuit. If they only pursue the breach of contract claim initially, they cannot later bring the negligence claim in a separate action.
Key case law includes:
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
| State | Application of Doctrine |
|---|---|
| California | Strongly enforces the doctrine in civil cases. |
| New York | Recognizes the doctrine but allows some exceptions for separate claims. |
| Texas | Generally applies the doctrine, particularly in tort cases. |
This is not a complete list. State laws vary and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
| Term | Definition | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Res judicata | A doctrine preventing the same issue from being tried again once it has been judged. | Single-controversy doctrine focuses on asserting all claims in one action, while res judicata prevents re-litigation of claims already decided. |
| Collateral estoppel | A doctrine that prevents the re-litigation of issues that have already been settled in court. | Collateral estoppel applies to specific issues, whereas the single-controversy doctrine pertains to the requirement of including all related claims in one action. |
If you believe the single-controversy doctrine applies to your situation, consider the following steps:
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
If you fail to include all related claims, you may be barred from bringing those claims in a future lawsuit.