We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Sherman–Sorrells Doctrine: A Legal Perspective on Entrapment
Definition & Meaning
The Sherman"Sorrells Doctrine is a legal principle that allows a defendant to assert an affirmative defense of entrapment. This defense claims that the accused was not inclined to commit a crime until they were persuaded or induced to do so by a public official. For a successful entrapment defense under this doctrine, two key elements must be established: government inducement and the absence of predisposition on the part of the accused to engage in criminal behavior.
This doctrine serves as an absolute defense against federal crimes, meaning that if the court finds these elements met, the defendant cannot be convicted. If there is any uncertainty, the jury will decide whether the entrapment occurred when determining the accused's guilt or innocence.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The Sherman"Sorrells Doctrine is primarily used in criminal law, particularly in cases involving allegations of entrapment. It provides a framework for defendants to argue that they were led into committing a crime by law enforcement officials, rather than having a pre-existing intention to engage in illegal conduct.
Individuals facing federal charges may utilize this doctrine as part of their defense strategy. Legal forms related to entrapment defenses can be found through platforms like US Legal Forms, which offer templates crafted by attorneys to assist users in navigating their legal situations.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A defendant charged with drug trafficking claims that an undercover officer repeatedly pressured them to sell drugs, despite the defendant having no prior intent to do so. This could be a basis for an entrapment defense under the Sherman"Sorrells Doctrine.
Example 2: A person accused of theft argues that they were encouraged by a police informant to commit the crime, which they would not have done otherwise. This situation could also invoke the doctrine (hypothetical example).
Relevant laws & statutes
The Sherman"Sorrells Doctrine is rooted in case law, particularly:
Sherman v. United States, 356 U.S. 369 (1958)
Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435 (1932)
These cases established the legal basis for the entrapment defense in federal law.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Entrapment Standard
California
Similar to federal standard; requires proof of inducement and lack of predisposition.
New York
Follows a subjective test focusing on the defendant's state of mind.
Texas
Uses an objective standard, considering whether law enforcement's actions would induce a reasonable person.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Entrapment
A defense claiming that law enforcement induced a person to commit a crime they would not have otherwise committed.
Duress
A defense claiming that a person was forced to commit a crime due to immediate threat of harm.
Coercion
A broader term that involves forcing someone to act against their will, which may not necessarily involve law enforcement.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe that the Sherman"Sorrells Doctrine applies to your situation, consider the following steps:
Document any interactions with law enforcement that may support your claim of entrapment.
Consult with a legal professional who can help you understand your rights and options.
Explore US Legal Forms for ready-to-use legal templates that can assist you in preparing your defense.
In complex cases, professional legal assistance is highly recommended to navigate the intricacies of the law.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.