We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Scandalous Matter: A Deep Dive into Its Legal Implications
Definition & meaning
Scandalous matter refers to information or allegations that are not only offensive but also irrelevant to a legal case. Such matters are considered disgraceful or defamatory and do not contribute meaningfully to the action or defense being presented in court. In legal contexts, scandalous matter may include content that is immoral, indecent, or unbecoming of the dignity of the court. Courts have the authority to remove these allegations from legal pleadings if they do not pertain to the case at hand.
Table of content
Legal use & context
This term is primarily used in civil litigation, where parties may attempt to introduce scandalous matter to sway the court's opinion or to damage the reputation of the opposing party. Courts can strike out such allegations to maintain decorum and ensure that only relevant information is considered. Users can manage these issues themselves using legal templates from US Legal Forms, which are designed to help navigate the complexities of legal pleadings.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: In a defamation lawsuit, a defendant includes allegations about the plaintiff's personal life that are not relevant to the case. The court may strike these allegations as scandalous matter.
Example 2: A plaintiff in a personal injury case attempts to introduce evidence of the defendant's past criminal behavior that has no bearing on the current case. The court could deem this information scandalous and irrelevant, removing it from consideration. (hypothetical example)
Relevant laws & statutes
Scandalous matter is addressed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically Rule 12(f), which allows courts to strike from any pleading any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter. This rule provides the legal framework for removing such allegations from court documents.
State-by-state differences
State
Variation
California
Similar rules apply, but local courts may have specific guidelines on what constitutes scandalous matter.
New York
New York courts also allow for the striking of scandalous matter, with additional emphasis on maintaining court decorum.
Texas
Texas courts may have stricter guidelines regarding what is considered scandalous, often requiring a higher threshold for removal.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Impertinent Matter
Information that is not relevant to the case but may not necessarily be offensive.
Impertinent matter is not inherently scandalous; it simply lacks relevance.
Defamatory Statements
False statements that damage a person's reputation.
Defamatory statements may be scandalous but are specifically focused on reputation damage.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe scandalous matter has been introduced in your case, you can file a motion to strike this information from the pleadings. It may be beneficial to consult with a legal professional to ensure that your motion is properly drafted and supported by relevant legal arguments. Additionally, US Legal Forms offers templates that can assist you in preparing the necessary documents.
Find a legal form that suits your needs
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.