What is a Running Objection? A Comprehensive Legal Overview
Definition & Meaning
A running objection, also known as a continuing objection, is a legal term that refers to a single objection made by a lawyer that applies to multiple questions during a specific line of questioning in a trial. This type of objection is typically allowed by a judge when the judge has already overruled an objection that is relevant to many questions. The purpose of a running objection is to preserve the objection for the appellate record, ensuring that the issue can be reviewed later if necessary.
Legal Use & context
Running objections are commonly used in various areas of law, including civil, criminal, and family law. They are particularly relevant during trials where a lawyer may need to object repeatedly to similar questions posed by the opposing counsel. By establishing a running objection, the lawyer can streamline the trial process and focus on the substantive issues without having to object each time a similar question is asked.
Users can manage running objections and related legal procedures using templates and resources available through platforms like US Legal Forms, which provide tools for drafting legal documents and understanding courtroom procedures.
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
(Hypothetical example) During a trial, a lawyer might object to a line of questioning about a witness's prior convictions. If the judge overrules the objection, the lawyer can establish a running objection to preserve their stance on the relevance of the witness's past, applying it to all subsequent questions about the witness's character.