We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding Restraint on Use: Legal Definitions and Implications
Definition & meaning
Restraint on use refers to limitations placed on how property can be used, typically set by a testator (the person who makes a will) or grantor (the person who transfers property). These restrictions must align with the overall intentions of the estate being devised or granted. A blanket restriction on property use is generally considered invalid. However, a covenant that imposes a reasonable, partial restriction on trade and competition can be valid if it protects the interests of the involved parties without harming the public. The assessment of reasonableness is based on whether the restraint offers fair protection to the party benefiting from it and does not excessively interfere with public interests.
Table of content
Legal use & context
Restraint on use is primarily relevant in property law, particularly in the context of wills, trusts, and real estate transactions. It often involves covenants that restrict the use of property for specific purposes, such as preventing certain types of businesses from operating in a residential area. Users can manage these issues through legal forms, especially when drafting or reviewing property agreements or estate plans.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A property owner may place a covenant on a commercial property, restricting its use to retail only, thereby preventing it from being used for manufacturing. This is a reasonable restraint that protects the property's value and the interests of the surrounding community.
Example 2: A testator may specify in their will that a family home cannot be sold for a period of ten years after their death, allowing family members to reside there. This is a specific restraint that aligns with the testator's intent to keep the family together. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Key Differences
California
Allows for broader covenants in commercial properties.
Texas
Restricts covenants that may unreasonably limit property use.
New York
Enforces strict scrutiny on restraints affecting public interest.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Restrictive covenant
A promise in a deed or lease that limits how property can be used.
More specific than general restraint; often tied to property agreements.
Servitude
A legal right to use another's property for a specific purpose.
Involves rights granted to others, unlike restraints which limit usage.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are dealing with a restraint on use in property matters, consider the following steps:
Review any existing property agreements or wills to understand the specific restrictions.
Consult with a legal professional if the restraints seem unreasonable or if you plan to challenge them.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you draft or amend property agreements.
Find a legal form that suits your needs
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.