We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Restraint Of Trade: A Comprehensive Guide to Its Legal Meaning
Definition & Meaning
Restraint of trade refers to any action or agreement that limits competition, trade, or sales in interstate commerce. Such practices can significantly affect the economy and are generally prohibited by antitrust laws. The primary legislation governing these issues is the Sherman Antitrust Act, enacted in 1890, which aims to promote fair competition and prevent monopolistic behaviors.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This term is primarily used in antitrust law, which deals with regulations that promote competition and prevent unfair business practices. Restraint of trade can arise in various legal contexts, including:
Non-compete agreements between employers and employees
Tying arrangements where a buyer is forced to purchase additional products
Contracts that restrict business activities post-sale
Individuals can manage some of these issues using legal templates available through US Legal Forms, crafted by experienced attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
One example of restraint of trade is a non-compete agreement where an employee agrees not to work for a competing company within a certain geographic area for a specified time after leaving their job. This can limit their ability to find new employment (hypothetical example).
Another example involves a software company that requires retailers to sell only its products, thereby restricting competition from other brands.
Relevant laws & statutes
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 is the most significant statute related to restraint of trade. Key sections include:
Section 1: Declares contracts or conspiracies in restraint of trade illegal.
Section 2: Addresses monopolization and attempts to monopolize trade.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Key Differences
California
Generally limits non-compete agreements; favors employee mobility.
Texas
Allows non-compete agreements under certain conditions, but must be reasonable in scope.
New York
Enforces non-compete agreements but requires them to be necessary to protect legitimate business interests.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Restraint of Trade
Actions or agreements that limit competition.
Focuses on agreements that restrict market competition.
Monopolization
Dominating a market to control prices and supply.
Specifically involves controlling a market, not just limiting competition.
Non-Compete Agreement
A contract preventing an employee from competing post-employment.
A specific type of restraint of trade, often scrutinized for legality.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe you are affected by a restraint of trade issue, consider the following steps:
Review any agreements you have signed, such as non-compete clauses.
Consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and options.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates and resources that may help you navigate your situation.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.