We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding Responsive Applications [Railroad Acquisition]: A Legal Overview
Definition & Meaning
A responsive application is a type of legal filing made in reaction to a primary application. These applications seek affirmative relief, which means they request specific approvals or conditions related to the primary application. Responsive applications can include inconsistent applications, inclusion applications, and any other requests that require submission to the relevant regulatory board. Examples of such requests include trackage rights, purchases, constructions, operations, pooling, terminal operations, abandonments, and other proceedings not specifically covered by existing regulations.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Responsive applications are primarily used in the context of railroad acquisitions and regulatory compliance. They are relevant in transportation law, particularly under the jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board. Individuals and companies involved in railroad operations may need to file responsive applications to address issues raised by a primary application or to seek additional permissions related to their operations. Users can often manage these filings themselves with the appropriate legal templates and forms available through resources like US Legal Forms.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A railroad company files a primary application to acquire another railroad. In response, a competing railroad submits a responsive application seeking to impose conditions on the acquisition to ensure fair competition.
Example 2: A company applies for trackage rights to operate on another railroad's tracks. The original railroad files a responsive application to contest the request, seeking specific conditions for approval. (hypothetical example)
Relevant laws & statutes
Responsive applications are governed by the regulations outlined in 49 CFR 1180, which pertains to railroad acquisitions and control. This regulation provides the framework for filing and processing these applications.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Primary Application
An initial filing seeking approval for a specific action.
Responsive applications are filed in reaction to primary applications.
Inconsistent Application
A type of responsive application that conflicts with the primary application.
Inconsistent applications are a subset of responsive applications.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself needing to file a responsive application, consider the following steps:
Review the primary application thoroughly to understand the context and implications.
Gather all necessary information and documentation to support your responsive application.
Utilize legal form templates available through US Legal Forms to ensure your application is correctly formatted.
If the situation is complex or you are unsure about the process, consult a legal professional for guidance.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Surface Transportation Board and relevant state authorities.
Possible Penalties
Failure to comply with regulations may result in denial of application.
Key takeaways
Frequently asked questions
A responsive application is a filing made in response to a primary application, seeking affirmative relief or conditions related to that primary application.
Any individual or entity affected by a primary application can file a responsive application to address their concerns or seek additional permissions.
Requests can include trackage rights, construction approvals, operational changes, and other related matters.
While you can file on your own using legal templates, consulting a lawyer is advisable for complex situations.
If denied, you may have the option to appeal the decision or modify your application based on feedback from the regulatory board.